- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
5 k7 \# ?& ~5 g pBoy Induced by Indirect Topical
; h0 `2 U* x4 {$ e1 X- R- P% HExposure to Testosterone8 Q% I1 @: c7 l6 {
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2( M7 R! j& T2 {+ X* J( O
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
7 ?. D: s5 B2 S! n+ \% K5 q+ vClinical Pediatrics" M+ x, c( w* i+ `6 Q( {& W$ S
Volume 46 Number 6
N4 j+ s3 f6 V5 _/ v) N( I9 H4 _July 2007 540-5437 Z8 D' y( d! x& ?' C
© 2007 Sage Publications
% e2 ]" Z# @6 w) L3 B# A10.1177/00099228062966513 s u6 }7 D2 h1 _* [
http://clp.sagepub.com
. O7 [7 b! W. N. phosted at
) x9 M, K2 _2 t! \$ Y# Ihttp://online.sagepub.com
$ E" ^; c$ m* v4 `: H4 q8 vPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
# |- u3 {4 \. n3 A- l. wis a significant concern for physicians. Central0 Z; x' M7 N9 e3 f/ F$ [0 v
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
7 C, B9 g. [6 lthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
- b( b6 ^4 m' L" [% Y( q) ma higher incidence of organic central nervous system0 h+ t( l* T& _- T
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested3 @3 E. J! M* y4 B# {( N7 K6 `, m
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic7 o; J V; S1 i
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
, P1 y7 W# R8 t5 q' scles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We* q+ Y9 y. [& E# y
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the M; G7 c! O$ W7 I! e
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
# r$ R: e6 H e3 Z `) Mment without testicular enlargement, which was due
/ B6 ?1 B7 O$ x( h/ r' w7 Cto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
8 }, E3 K. J- {% @0 ]% Q# fthe father. The family initially concealed this infor-8 z! K0 S6 n* w
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this" O' r$ c) S ]% T- z
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of
) }8 l. |4 d2 ntestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-! A' x( x! ^& {; U+ o. Y
bly more common than the rare case report in the
L) Q: F7 |6 ?! }! Y0 dliterature.4
, Q" A. {8 M6 G) m! gPatient Report% Y, S* q- z. Q0 N/ U
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
* e( L6 z: ?! r' [9 S' _$ R: Rendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern( C8 O, ^0 q% I
of early sexual development. His mother noticed/ t; c) |% m) q4 z i; k
light colored pubic hair development when he was
+ ?+ g; n2 R" ?4 y- w" s( xFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
% T- \2 W* {0 TSouth Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
' T5 k( t! O p, T6 l. U6 ]/ W0 s9 aAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
; Q) M" S; S9 V1 B _8 TProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of. U* Z; i4 N1 V: D
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;$ e5 Z% @' q6 P% X+ F; M
e-mail: [email protected].
3 w3 k( ~+ {' F9 e4 u) P/ Oabout 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became2 c" c7 i9 @4 a3 q6 l
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
3 D, y" Q8 U' p' h# {$ I- dment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
+ }) ^' [7 d2 C) u$ K4 B0 hwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with9 `8 Y/ H- m/ o5 _" F' q3 k
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
* } M+ s# i R20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year" M! C; G% o* X
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
9 V, O/ u: ?% M, |2 B. Ssolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,1 j- V& i: r! P2 Q4 M L1 `
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development1 j5 j" S9 D" j2 P
was age appropriate.* A- [% Q" ~' o7 ]1 |% C
The family history was remarkable for the father,+ R% x9 ?, b1 v( B
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,+ i" b# U' c9 L6 K+ U
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s8 G* p+ O `5 W, o
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat6 \2 \+ V3 T C, \- g O
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
: _, `% A. @$ `9 i/ A8 hThe father denied taking any other medication. The, S$ E& ~3 r) I8 u8 e# G8 v2 u
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
9 K. G- A/ T ?1 w6 m4 twas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
. F9 N) M$ H! s9 Z3 W/ j; {+ P5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-" ?) K) u7 z4 r' q
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-8 l# ~) g! V6 Y" c, W
tives. There were no siblings." }9 B' ] M7 a; c9 c& Y
Physical Examination
- y7 R2 f7 ^* ZThe physical examination revealed a very active,
/ b! S9 a, b7 x$ E" Iplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
# e- X( a% p/ ]" D$ t' za blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was4 f+ ~, h7 a E. k
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
6 H2 d1 x" _' C$ D: j) ^0 j(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
% t, ~* j9 Y5 Q8 gvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of. \: g$ R3 K. N6 l% p. `: L: Z
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
6 A; `3 y0 `6 GThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for
5 `9 q7 R7 R' b. u" c. \enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
8 }& o" B( n: H7 G8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well4 G4 f6 y( f6 i2 g$ u. Z/ Q
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
/ _. V. `0 G/ ?, j. ?! N540 ~$ z `7 h$ M! u. f* a# d
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
6 [* n9 m/ S: \1 p3 {the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
# }" }1 J$ _0 c3 C' mtesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.1 K4 Y- y- t6 U3 c3 F& ^
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat1 Q5 t3 U( N0 P4 F. b$ e
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
9 R9 d0 \ i: t. {8 N7 i$ m6 p2 J6 Babnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.! t' S7 A( S8 A: x5 S% A* g9 z( r
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
0 n; ]' p% z8 k$ \5 {9 Bbilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
" p# q" D0 g' X; ^, [# R5 cof papilledema.
0 U" r7 Y* _( N( L0 oLaboratory Evaluation
6 y |' p* i6 p7 oThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by
; {* ~5 {9 m4 n, a/ Eusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-$ y) } Z7 Q. J0 A2 u# v' c1 P
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
2 g [ k7 x+ T# Qkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test' B1 q# D; o, B" v- S! \- }+ f6 k$ g
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-. l/ c8 b9 q1 q) ~
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal)., J+ S9 q+ N, ~& m7 z x0 Z
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood4 F/ R$ o$ N5 R( _6 q+ C+ \1 i3 |
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were e _# z o. [2 B; }
within normal range for his age. The concentration( n2 B. h8 s2 K0 Y4 k
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL* a& x$ p9 K( \ x0 l) e: g
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
9 E+ o- _" E ^! wng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-; Q) _( A0 k/ ~7 t% D7 D$ f" c
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
8 c" w$ s: W2 e& P9 K# cdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to8 Z) i& D7 D/ _! V- s. n8 d& P
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)# V0 k- V; F- i! H% j6 X
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-- n1 V9 y, r3 s6 @: c! X! Y
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
1 W) p8 t- ~" S o$ V. g8 utestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),& ~* N$ m$ [& {
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than# U9 ~$ n6 G: Q+ ?0 t; G+ G
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
! o' X8 B! W0 ?/ _6 O1 T# m# ?stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone- g$ o7 j% ~" r! O& m
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL e7 T/ m9 ^3 a, p4 R4 X
(prepubertal).8 U0 f! E$ `# K3 q7 k* L
The parents were notified about the laboratory
! d1 v( E% q* x7 |/ |. Oresults and were informed that all of the tests were) Q( d" T/ |: R( j4 C* ?# D, r, V
normal except the testosterone level was high. The
/ j' l. y% x: I) C- Dfollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
0 u3 B2 L9 q" Z7 g, {: d9 q( xobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
. ?$ a9 Q+ B H7 ]ever, the family did not return for 4 months.9 _; i: s( Z! V! n& L, Y* X
Physical examination at this time revealed that the% y% C( ^) K) }$ ~/ _1 a
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
. @( Z9 C" R: ~5 c- ]$ V% B0 y$ b2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained1 x2 A- l6 z7 Y& ?6 C# |1 ~
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-* ^8 \ k& \2 z8 Y' t' D- G( E
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at. @5 m# j/ v |+ T% W
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 23 {3 w8 |0 h$ L
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
1 h5 ^% w/ D* ~& ^9 P" k4 t% ^1 xThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-5 B/ Q0 R l& J5 H" S' v* F) {
ing frequent erections.1 h& K* [2 p* e) T
Both parents were again questioned about use of
8 i' J4 \ y) Lany ointment/creams that they may have applied to: X5 |+ J: Y& w5 D* D, i; q
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
$ H; d" K6 I, a4 JTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
6 n, {: e8 I+ V; Juse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
8 d/ |; J0 {) R! n9 j6 S) Y" Xing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
' x9 L. X% ~! fa year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
( t- _% P; q) [* x& Q+ d! Bto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
( K/ |; a+ { s! }* l7 x1 u) Rscribed by his family physician for decreased libido# E, D6 W$ `- Y9 n5 H# O2 U
secondary to depression.$ G5 F, |2 i/ H$ `2 n8 s* \% A
The child slept in the same bed with parents.6 F, F+ [7 u) t& a3 a
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
! Z; K& x' b4 H* w) Z. @8 E7 echest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-& G, N! l) }( R# Y
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.9 b; i+ @2 [) @/ v: M9 e0 c
The father also admitted that after the phone call,
5 q" `& ?' O3 B4 U: _+ Q3 Jwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby1 U( t! {# ^7 c) }0 @0 s$ C5 N" V
was high, he then read the product information
( {' `% E) f4 g9 W6 B; r& w+ T wpacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-# Q5 D$ |. _: ~: C7 G {2 M7 u. V
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they1 `7 I& |- Y. Q9 R c) ^1 c, z; r
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the4 f2 P% D: B& g* {) w
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had
' Z' `7 H" f$ g6 f9 G9 Y& ?3 b' Tbeen using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone0 l9 c) m4 L+ b/ U3 I4 Y, |
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
% c* g- u! `& N1 v4 e; y7 f% tlaboratory to obtain the test.
\: X/ X9 s, z5 WDiscussion
0 B$ U' b0 r ^8 e3 v: ]5 TPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
9 ~. U# _/ X7 G0 a' E, }sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
$ k O8 m1 ], a& UPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
2 Z3 [' E0 r+ C) h6 r" rit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
) f0 H+ y$ w+ G0 u- k5 i: u" S$ Gthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-2 A+ V: p" a- i# ?" `' @5 x
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP. @+ V- y* |3 T' o( E
may have a central nervous system lesion that is1 X- D- U; F" W5 `+ [' \6 V: x
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
6 f3 v) U. g5 v- v% ?& o; Oamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-5 p" B& r/ i2 K6 ]
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
* ?8 J1 a3 w# l$ h5 W( S+ o% D' h9 Rboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-9 h, S* v& B6 i! ]# Z# W
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-6 J: G& y3 f) x# f; z9 l! T
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by) ]% W# |3 _% U: _% V( z9 j& R
gonadotropins.1,3
: E# |% a4 h% Z! X& t3 TGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
" \7 I1 o) [! w4 Ycious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
9 g/ V7 J+ V. I8 R/ mandrogenic stimulation from either endogenous or
. }/ p) K6 X5 M) \! O& S& Rexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
" t( r4 ]0 J. C$ p2 I) R" z! Lulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing, V8 f+ ^" y: I$ e7 r8 L8 A- ~
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
& c) `& X: U/ _+ x$ y* I! ~9 madrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
7 ?- M6 _: A j7 Tpuberty in boys.3,4% ~/ l9 ?7 ?' L, K$ x
The most common form of congenital adrenal
* f2 P* B4 k" _$ a( K3 J) Xhyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.# x5 D k' |. M. b
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in7 A. y/ y/ \! f, B/ D
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
& z- f+ b) E& I' Z, jan adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen. M7 |7 d# F! W3 f! ~; P9 |1 V! Y6 Y
excess.1,3
4 [! b0 {4 B- d( x; x2 A3 pat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from0 m5 J5 h9 ~- {6 E! f: F. A7 v
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
& P- Q- f3 V3 V) p! d p$ `% e3 Q* u/ JA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-& M7 O7 E8 ^. |
independent precocious puberty, which is also known! `8 B4 d0 ?5 M/ ]% i0 F
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
X) I/ q" p$ J! t; D% tvery young age. The physical findings in these boys
( g3 Y' c0 x7 nwith this disorder are full pubertal development,! E- m1 Y- T) a+ ?) q& T4 c
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys2 P; r0 J" O4 u
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder5 K& x$ W0 I6 `2 d9 \9 @
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show& ^) v( `+ I8 w2 G! c/ P7 x6 Z
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
: H$ F4 b3 e' M8 C+ `releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
1 D5 \( F3 u; K( W3 ]- Jautosomal dominant disorder that affects only9 I1 h$ o1 r7 ~& U. X3 n, A
males; therefore, other male members of the family% S4 L7 q/ @/ _( e3 U" e, R, j
may have similar precocious puberty.3
: o- m2 G6 Q* E% B' UIn our patient, physical examination was incon-, J1 v5 X4 x% v
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-2 C/ N5 r3 C6 v! O% N
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis2 L1 Z! f$ ~! o+ W. \
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
% W" ~4 P. m0 z& b& _+ ^started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,( t- z# N+ x! _7 e% q
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
$ ^$ \9 D1 Q1 m5 y) Z) D# S. nbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-! C2 J5 X+ U% @, V) I" D
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
4 k8 Z. G0 D& n4 r" r: Ibiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,! G6 h6 d( w3 b7 H8 [
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase
/ C* U+ a x. q4 {7 t' H1 ldeficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-' l/ i. p& \2 T: m
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.! c. I6 D5 q# d; m+ y
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
9 N$ F" B9 E9 }, U8 I& ksuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because$ y# Z `- |6 {: k' M7 U3 J. F
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
7 L+ `) G1 P5 @3 A0 q v& ]pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
3 V( X- A& Q. F" u# h" Cdecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-# c* @' J# Y6 \# J- e* y2 d \/ f9 N
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
" P1 e1 |- m; a( G, _/ ?2 Eusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
! e4 p' `+ Y1 _$ K. d6 n' gDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or+ _: @9 i. C; a' j$ c
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
2 j. r& e- W. _: M" h- ^& T. xunprotected females through direct skin exposure.
3 o: _3 C7 s4 r% X; KSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
g9 V Z6 ]# {4 d# E3 {, lbaseline value in those females who were exposed to) o1 t8 B ]- d9 A" M
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
0 r- R- f x/ Q. d2 cpartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
, d2 F* }% G: q+ U4 c6 Vtion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.. j- x5 B# g v" g2 W
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,* Q, c* w; W8 W* g. B. u
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
3 y$ K6 v" c Y9 c% Ldermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
' [" n9 g4 r* `, ~/ d% }) s, P- wterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more0 ?; z7 L% ?2 P" E' M7 M
active in young children exposed to testosterone) }2 a6 J1 N& p) T3 v
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-
$ ]" J2 h3 ]5 s+ E% G1 Qdrotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to. V# d5 D* Y9 l$ s, V0 @0 k* s. p
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
4 T9 Z/ U+ h# e7 kchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and
* f; i3 ?! J* M5 H! Z% }advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
: J. x' V2 ]* _1 YThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during
* D; t# G4 t+ E* U- Jearly childhood on pubertal development and final, _# ?. d% z$ @! J
adult height are not fully known and always remain E9 J. o+ W( h1 z$ T0 G
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
/ h" ~. m& |- g8 rterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some3 f# w& R% y8 W: z# N' ^* `
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after6 x$ [6 G5 x5 L' G4 E( p) e
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation% y# F, [1 e! r, w4 @
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9( U5 M. k6 y+ f y
There are conflicting reports and controversy9 a# i, X" B& I! [
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
: Q! f5 ?+ c# ?& z) rpenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
6 P7 R# F8 E) X! f7 c0 c, ]adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
& u1 p! s2 H9 u, X3 N1 ~ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,6 G4 ~. a: L; `1 o- t5 V2 M
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
5 ]6 ?* O( h" bchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
0 F# ~5 z7 h1 ?, vpenile length in clinical studies.
% |& C8 C. ]' Y3 }Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
6 S9 g- s! e% g' i' fgoing to experience any of the untoward effects from+ H1 m& T/ x8 l! l* T7 b5 I
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
" t7 d* a( x- Q0 Z Q# B& s& athe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
, p8 b: w! C+ \% g7 XAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of, b' a" O6 L4 ]3 y1 [: z4 D1 A7 V
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
# m" r6 T. q: \! ]the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
3 a. Q3 L9 K2 Y+ i- lheight will not be affected.
@/ ~( k* [# mAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-/ X3 N3 l) _4 }" c& |
ability of androgen products in our society may
/ ]5 u4 n+ k& Dindeed cause more virilization in male or female
3 A' m, t% Y/ X0 P+ ?$ O' Q1 ^9 dchildren than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
$ A/ c, v4 m: }6 `, Lgen products must be considered and specific ques-
$ N' s$ I/ H4 ?" Etioning about the use of a testosterone product or
7 }" a3 s. _3 S3 xgel should be asked of the family members during6 x8 q0 D' U! W" |
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-4 g( I/ ~7 W2 y6 Q3 _6 ?) f1 c- b
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
* J" a0 S! |# ?* k' f: n* P, Nnosis can be established by just a few tests and by* L( L) C6 l7 L& M8 b
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
& G Z' L& d( f6 E9 M( b: w) @; _history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
* ]3 q3 D$ O3 U4 M0 n( M8 b- @result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive. \9 @: {, ^. @/ |, Q( }
investigation. The primary care physician should be
0 G. r% R- q- D. r# H; U7 caware of this fact, because most of these children$ v& g+ E( J/ H! {5 r
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
! v' M, |4 Y( f& ^( D2 CDesk Reference and package insert should also put a
2 M- B, o4 H: W* \" zwarning about the virilizing effect on a male or
" L: U6 h, r& ffemale child who might come in contact with some-/ k/ V1 b7 f/ ~4 H" f
one using any of these products.
* s+ `% {, _, h: OReferences$ x9 g1 v# o' m" G- e; J2 K' D5 o5 T
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
. y, W1 k% f1 W ~and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric; ^1 B1 Z4 e) K* z9 K# x' @8 S
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;' F( m1 ~% m+ T, T: y; X& f% D
2002: 565-628.
: c: ?6 J5 N/ N8 B# U2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious4 h. N; ]( u: X; u. R9 q3 w& Q
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|